Skip to Main Content
Linking stream and landscape trajectories in the southern AppalachiansAuthor(s): Edward P. Gardiner; Andrew B. Sutherland; Rebecca J. Bixby; Mark C. Scott; Judy L. Meyer; Gene S. Helfman; E. Fred Benfield; Cathy M. Pringle; Paul V. Bolstad; David N. Wear
Source: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 156(1-4):17-36.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
View PDF (909.97 KB)
DescriptionA proactive sampling strategy was designed and implemented in 2000 to document changes in streams whose catchment land uses were predicted to change over the next two decades due to increased building density. Diatoms, macroinvertebrates, fishes, suspended sediment, dissolved solids, and bed composition were measured at two reference sites and six sites where a socioeconomic model suggested new building construction would influence stream ecosystems in the future; we label these “hazard sites.” The six hazard sites were located in catchments with forested and agricultural land use histories. Diatoms were species-poor at reference sites, where riparian forest cover was significantly higher than all other sites. Cluster analysis, Wishart’s distance function, non-metric multidimensional scaling, indicator species analysis, and t-tests show that macroinvertebrate assemblages, fish assemblages, in situ physical measures, and catchment land use and land cover were different between streams whose catchments were mostly forested, relative to those with agricultural land use histories and varying levels of current and predicted development. Comparing initial results with other regional studies, we predict homogenization of fauna with increased nutrient inputs and sediment associated with agricultural sites where more intense building activities are occurring. Based on statistical separability of sampled sites, catchment classes were identified and mapped throughout an 8,600 km2 region in western North Carolina’s Blue Ridge physiographic province. The classification is a generalized representation of two ongoing trajectories of land use change that we suggest will support streams with diverging biota and physical conditions over the next two decades.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGardiner, Edward P.; Sutherland, Andrew B. ; Bixby, Rebecca J.; Scott, Mark C.; Meyer, Judy L.; Helfman, Gene S. ; Benfield, E. Fred; Pringle, Cathy M.; Bolstad, Paul V.; Wear, David N. 2009. Linking stream and landscape trajectories in the southern Appalachians. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 156(1-4):17-36.
KeywordsStream ecology, land use change, biotic response, water chemistry, watershed, catchment classification, ecological forecasting
- Functional redundancy of stream macroconsumers despite differences in catchment land use.
- Physical and biological responses of streams to suburbanization of historically agricultural watersheds
- Environmental indicators of macroinvertebrate and fish assemblage integrity in urbanizing watersheds
XML: View XML