Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Barton D. Clinton
    Date: 2011
    Source: Forest Ecology and Management 261:979–988
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    PDF: Download Publication  (312.87 KB)


    Vegetated riparian buffers are critical for protecting aquatic and terrestrial processes and habitats in southern Appalachian ecosystems. In this case study, we examined the effect of riparian buffer width on stream water quality following upland forest management activities in four headwater catchments. Three riparian buffer widths were delineated prior to cutting; 0m (no-buffer), 10 m, and 30 m, and one reference site (REF). A two-age prescription timber harvest was conducted on all cut sites with a target residual basal area of approximately 4.0m2 ha−1. Harvesting occurred from October 2005 through February 2007. Stream sampling was conducted weekly from January 2004 through December 2008. Stream water chemistry, temperature, and total suspended solids (TSS) were used as metrics of water quality. Analyses were conducted on weekly grab samples. Pre-treatment concentrations of all solutes were similar to conditions found in other headwater streams at similar topographic positions around the region. The greatest responses to cutting occurred on the no-buffer site. Compared with pre-harvest levels on the no-buffer site, stream nitrate concentration ([NO3–N]) increased 2-fold during both base and stormflow following harvest, and all base cations increased in concentration. [NO3–N] on the no-buffer site showed steady decline with time following the initial post-harvest increase. The other sites did not show increases in [NO3–N] and very small or no responses in other stream chemistry parameters. There was no TSS response at stormflow on any site, and during baseflow, TSS decreased on all but the no-buffer site. Stream water temperature increased during the summer on the no-buffer site. Although alternative land uses may have different requirements, these results suggest that for riparian buffer widths of 10m and wider, the forest harvest activities implemented in this study did not substantially impact stream water quality. Hence, 10m wide buffers in these ecosystems may provide effective protection with respect to stream water chemistry, TSS, and temperature.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Clinton, Barton D. 2011. Stream water responses to timber harvest: Riparian buffer width effectiveness. Forest Ecology and Management 261:979–988.


    Riparian buffers, Southern Appalachians, Timber harvest, Headwater streams

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page