Skip to Main Content
Effects of Orientation and Weatherproofing on the Detection of Bat Echolocation CallsAuthor(s): E. Britzke; B. Slack; M Armstrong; S. Loeb
Source: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 1(2):136–141
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (928.54 KB)
DescriptionUltrasonic detectors are powerful tools for the study of bat ecology. Many options are available for deploying acoustic detectors including various weatherproofing designs and microphone orientations, but the impacts of these options on the quantity and quality of the bat calls that are recorded are unknown. We compared the impacts of three microphone orientations (horizontal, 45u, and vertical) and two weatherproofing designs (polyvinyl chloride tubes and the BatHat) on the number of calls detected, call quality, and species detected by the Anabat II bat detector system at 17 sites in central Kentucky in May and June 2008. Detectors with BatHat weatherproofing recorded significantly fewer call sequences, pulses per file, species per site, and lower quality calls. Detectors in the horizontal position also tended to record fewer files, fewer species, and lower quality calls. These results illustrate potential impacts of deployment method on quality and quantity of data obtained. Because weatherproofing and orientation impacted the quality and quantity of data recorded, comparison of results using different methodologies should be made with caution.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBritzke,E.; Slack, B.; Armstrong, M; Loeb, S. 2010. Effects of Orientation and Weatherproofing on the Detection of Bat Echolocation Calls. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 1(2):136–141.
Keywordsactivity, Anabat, bats, orientation, weatherproofing
- Variation in bat detections due to detector orientation in a forest.
- Habitat use by bats in two Indiana forests prior to silvicultural treatments for oak regeneration
- Intra- and interspecific responses to Rafinesque’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquii) social calls
XML: View XML