Skip to Main Content
Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolismAuthor(s): Melody J. Bernot; Daniel J. Sobota; Robert O. Hall; Patrick J. Mulholland; Walter K. Dodds; Jackson R. Webster; Jennifer L. Tank; Linda R. Ashkenas; Lee W. Cooper; Clifford N. Dahm; Stanley V. Gregory; Nancy B. Grimm; Stephen K. Hamilton; Sherri L. Johnson; William H. McDowell; Judith L. Meyer; Bruce Peterson; Geoffrey C. Poole; H. Maurice Valett; Clay Arango; Jake J. Beaulieu; Amy J. Burgin; Chelsea Crenshaw; Ashley M. Helton; Laura Johnson; Jeff Merriam; B.R. Niederlehner; Jonathan M. O'Brien; Jody D. Potter; Richard W. Sheibley; Suzanne M. Thomas; Kym Wilson
Source: Freshwater Biology. 55: 1874-1890
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (4.66 MB)
DescriptionRates of whole-system metabolism (production and respiration) are fundamental indicators of ecosystem structure and function. Although first-order, proximal controls are well understood, assessments of the interactions between proximal controls and distal controls, such as land use and geographic region, are lacking. Thus, the influence of land use on stream metabolism across geographic regions is unknown. Further, there is limited understanding of how land use may alter variability in ecosystem metabolism across regions. Stream metabolism was measured in nine streams in each of eight regions (n = 72) across the United States and Puerto Rico. In each region, three streams were selected from a range of three land uses: agriculturally influenced, urban-influenced, and reference streams. Stream metabolism was estimated from diel changes in dissolved oxygen concentrations in each stream reach with correction for reaeration and groundwater input. Gross primary production (GPP) was highest in regions with little riparian vegetation (sagebrush steppe in Wyoming, desert shrub in Arizona/New Mexico) and lowest in forested regions (North Carolina, Oregon). In contrast, ecosystem respiration (ER) varied both within and among regions. Reference streams had significantly lower rates of GPP than urban or agriculturally influenced streams. Overall, consideration of the data separated by land-use categories showed reduced inter-regional variability in rates of metabolism, indicating that the influence of agricultural and urban land use can obscure regional differences in stream metabolism.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBernot, Melody J.; Sobota, Daniel J.; Hall, Robert O.; Mulholland, Patrick J.; Dodds, Walter K.; Webster, Jackson R.; Tank, Jennifer L.; Ashkenas, Linda R.; Cooper, Lee W.; Dahm, Clifford N.; Gregory, Stanley V.; Grimm, Nancy B.; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Johnson, Sherri L.; McDowell, William H.; Meyer, Judith L.; Peterson, Bruce; Poole, Geoffrey C.; Valett, H. Maurice; Arango, Clay; Beaulieu, Jake J.; Burgin, Amy J.; Crenshaw, Chelsea; Helton, Ashley M.; Johnson, Laura; Merriam, Jeff; Niederlehner, B.R.; O'Brien, Jonathan M.; Potter, Jody D.; Sheibley, Richard W.; Thomas, Suzanne M.; Wilson, Kym. 2010. Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism. Freshwater Biology. 55: 1874-1890.
Keywordsecosystem respiration, land use, metabolism, primary production, stream
- Inter-regional comparison of land-use effects on stream metabolism
- Recovery of stream ecosystem metabolism from historical agriculture
Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: denitrification
XML: View XML