Skip to Main Content
Trees are good, but…Author(s): E.G. McPherson; F. Ferrini
Source: Arborist News 19(5): 58-60
Publication Series: Other
PDF: View PDF (170.23 KB)
DescriptionWe know that “trees are good,” and most people believe this to be true. But if this is so, why are so many trees neglected, and so many tree wells empty? An individual’s attitude toward trees may result from their firsthand encounters with specific trees. Understanding how attitudes about trees are shaped, particularly aversion to trees, is critical to the business of sustaining healthy urban forests. Social scientists can play a large role by helping us understand the complex origins and impacts of tree antipathy. For example, attitudes about trees can be influenced by socio-cultural factors (e.g., trees keep witches away), hereditary traits (e.g., allergies), and chance experiences (e.g., trip and fall). Physical scientists can play a role by further clarifying relations between the trees we plant, their management, and human health and well-being. Truthful and accurate information about trees is important to trustworthy communication. Science and research can provide credible information you can use to knowledgably plan and manage trees. We provide a few examples in this article.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMcPherson, E.G.; Ferrini, F. 2010. Trees are good, but… Arborist News 19(5): 58-60
- Globalization and its implications for forest health
- Design of the Southern Forest Futures Project
- Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: translating science into policy
XML: View XML