Skip to Main Content
Critique of Sikkink and Keane's comparison of surface fuel sampling techniquesAuthor(s): Clinton S. Wright; Roger D. Ottmar; Robert E. Vihnanek
Source: International Journal of Wildland Fire. 19: 374-376
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (437.14 KB)
DescriptionThe 2008 paper of Sikkink and Keane compared several methods to estimate surface fuel loading in western Montana: two widely used inventory techniques (planar intersect and fixed-area plot) and three methods that employ photographs as visual guides (photo load, photoload macroplot and photo series). We feel, however, that their study design was inadequate to evaluate the accuracy of these methods when measured against a series of reference sites. Incorrect use may have contributed to the authors' inferences that the photo series method was the least accurate in this case. Furthermore, sampling efficiency was not adequately taken into account when evaluating overall efficacy of the five methods studied.
- Visit PNW's Publication Request Page to request a hard copy of this publication.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWright, Clinton S.; Ottmar, Roger D.; Vihnanek, Robert E. 2010. Critique of Sikkink and Keane's comparison of surface fuel sampling techniques. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 19: 374-376.
Keywordsfuel inventory techniques, photo series
- A comparison of five sampling techniques to estimate surface fuel loading in montane forests
- Development and evaluation of the photoload sampling technique
- Colorado Front Range fuel photo series
XML: View XML