Skip to Main Content
Comparing Planting Tools for Container Longleaf PineAuthor(s): Daniel J. Leduc; James D. Haywood; Shi-Jean Susana Sung
Source: Tree Planters' Notes 54(1):24-27
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: View PDF (210.25 KB)
DescriptionWe examined if compressing the soil to make a planting hole with a custom-built, solid round dibble versus coring the soil with a commercially available tube dibble influenced container-grown longleaf pine seedling development differently. Seven teen months after planting, the planting tool did not significantly affect root collar diameter, shoot or root mass, root-to-shoot ratio, or root system length. Seedlings planted with the solid round dibble, however, had significantly greater numbers of first-order lateral roots and better root system architecture. The light soil texture on the study site was likely an influencing factor in the relative performance between the two planting tools.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationLeduc, Daniel J.; Haywood, James D.; Sung, Shi-Jean Susana. 2011. Comparing Planting Tools for Container Longleaf Pine. Tree Planters' Notes 54(1):24-27.
- Comparing seven planting tools for container-grown longleaf pine seedlings
- Comparison of Planting Bar and Hoedad Planted Seedlings For Survival and Growth in a Controlled Environment
- Air lateral root pruning affects longleaf pine seedling root system morphology
XML: View XML