Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
Regional frameworks applied to hydrology: can landscape-based frameworks capture the hydrologic variability?Author(s): R. McManamay; D. Orth; C. Dolloff; E. Frimpong
Source: River Research and Applications
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
View PDF (533.41 KB)
DescriptionRegional frameworks have been used extensively in recent years to aid in broad-scale management. Widely used landscape-based regional frameworks, such as hydrologic landscape regions (HLRs) and physiographic provinces, may provide predictive tools of hydrologic variability. However, hydrologic-based regional frameworks, created using only streamflow data, are also available and have been created at various scales; thus, relating frameworks that share a common purpose can be informative. In addition, identifying how the relative importance of variables change in governing streamflow with respect to scale can also be informative. The purpose of this study was to determine whether landscape-based frameworks could explain variation in streamflow classifications and in the hydrologic variables used in their creation. We also evaluated how climate and watershed-based variables govern the divergence of different flow classifications at two different scales. HLRs and physiographic provinces poorly predicted flow class affiliation within our study and for the entire USA, although physiographic provinces explained more variability. We also found that HLRs explained very little variation in individual hydrologic parameters. Using variables summarized at the watershed scale, we found that climate will play a larger role in influencing hydrology across the entire US, whereas soils may govern variation in hydrology at smaller scales. Our results suggest that predictor variables, developed at the watershed scale, may be the most appropriate at explaining hydrology and that the variables used in creating regional landscape-based frameworks may be more useful than the frameworks themselves. In addition, managers should be careful when using landscape-based regional classifications for stream management because the scale of their construction may be too broad to capture differences in flow variability.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMcManamay, R. A.; Orth, D.J.; Dolloff, C.A.; Frimpong, E.A. 2011. Regional frameworks applied to hydrology: can landscape-based frameworks capture the hydrologic variability? 27: n/a. doi: 10.1002/rra.1535.
Keywordsflow classification, environmental flow standards, hydrologic landscape regions
- A regional classification of unregulated stream flows: spatial resolution and hierarchical frameworks.
- Hydrologic processes of forested headwater watersheds across a physiographaic gradient in the southeastern United States
- Perspectives on climate change, mountain hydrology, and water resources in the Oregon Cascades, USA
XML: View XML