Skip to Main Content
Forest policy impact assessment in the Ouachita National Forest and the valuation of conserving red-cockaded woodpeckersAuthor(s): Difei Zhang; Michael M. Huebschmann; Thomas B. Lynch; James M. Guldin
Source: American Journal of Applied Sciences 7(10):1345-1352
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (98.51 KB)
Related Research Highlights How much does a woodpecker cost
DescriptionProblem statement: The Ouachita National Forest received approval in 1996 for an amendment to its Forest Plan that would allocate 10% of the Forest to long-rotation silviculture. The purpose of the new management area is to restore pre-European settlement forest conditions and recreate habitat for the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker. Approach: This study explored the effects of restoring an ecosystem, from changes in the growth patterns of individual trees to ecosystem valuation of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker. It developed procedures for estimating the magnitude of economic impacts resulting from changes in timber production in the pine-bluestem management to project the value of conserving red-cockaded woodpeckers. Results: Over the entire simulation period, pine-bluestem management returns 75% of the undiscounted revenue generated by traditional management (660 versus 875 million dollars). For all 40,245 ha of the new management area managed for pine-bluestem, this cost amounts to $2.9 million per year. When combined with the $137 million decline in the present value of projected timber sale revenue from the area, the total cost rises to $4.2 million per year. Conclusion: The implied value for each pair of woodpeckers is either $10,550 per year for the desired 400 total pairs or $16,880 per year for the 250 reproducing pairs. Judging from the changes resulting from the transition to pine-bluestem management, adopting the new scenario will not cause significant adverse regional economic consequences. The success of the pine-bluestem restoration requires the maintenance of a burning regime that prevents competing vegetation from occupying the middle canopy layer.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationZhang, Difei; Huebschmann, Michael M.; Lynch, Thomas B.; Guldin, James M. 2010. Forest policy impact assessment in the Ouachita National Forest and the valuation of conserving red-cockaded woodpeckers. American Journal of Applied Sciences 7(10):1345-1352.
Keywordspine-bluestem, red-cockaded woodpecker, ecosystem valuation, shortleaf pine, economic impact assessment, Ouachita National Forest, Pinus echinata Mill.
- Growth projection and valuation of restoration of the shortleaf pine-bluestem grass ecosystem
- Restoring the shortleaf pine - bluestem grass ecosystem: An economic evaluation
- Economic evaluation of restoring the shortleaf pine-bluestem grass ecosystem on the Ouachita National Forest
XML: View XML