Skip to Main Content
NHA choice test : feeding dilemma for Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar)Author(s): Frederick Green; S. Nami Kartal; Patricia K. Lebow; Rachel A. Arango
Source: Green, Frederick; Kartal, S. Nami; Lebow, Patricia K.; Arango, Rachel A. 2011. NHA choice test : feeding dilemma for Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar). IRG/WP ; 11-10746. Stockholm, Sweden : IRG Secretariat, 2011: 10 p.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous
PDF: Download Publication (398.64 KB)
DescriptionAn AWPA laboratory choice test was performed with Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) to determine the role of feeding stimulation or aggregation by N’N napthaloylhydroxylamine (NHA). Pine blocks were vacuum treated with aqueous concentrations of NHA ranging from 250-10,000ppm and exposed to one gram R. flavipes workers in the dual block choice test which included one treated and one untreated block per modified AWPA laboratory test (E1-97) jar. At the end of four weeks, all test blocks were removed and replaced by either filter paper or untreated pine or aspen to observe long-term mortality/survival. Removed blocks were evaluated for mass loss and statistical evaluation. Mass loss was consistently greater in the untreated-pair blocks and ranged from 18-35%. Weight loss in the NHA-treated blocks was highest at low concentrations (18%) and decreased to < 5% at 10,000ppm. Termite mortality at the end of four weeks was observed nearly zero, however, over the next 12 weeks worker mortality reached 100% in certain groups. Filter paper or control pine was supplemented after the 4 week test period. We hypothesize that exposure to untreated pine during exposure to the NHA blocks delayed the 100% mortality previously observed in similar no-choice test using similar NHA concentrations of NHA, possibly by reduction below toxic levels. Modest accelerated feeding (stimulation) of the control blocks was observed only in the 2600ppm group. Overall, NHA treatment in pine behaves like a typical repellent wood preservative: as the concentration of preservative increases, feeding and mass loss decreases, however addition of an untreated pine block abrogates the high toxicity of NHA to R. flavipes (100%) as previously seen in several no-choice tests.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGreen, Frederick; Kartal, S. Nami; Lebow, Patricia K.; Arango, Rachel A. 2011. NHA choice test: Feeding dilemma for Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar). IRG/WP; 11-10746. Stockholm, Sweden: IRG Secretariat, 2011: 10 p.
KeywordsReticulitermes flavipes, termites, insect pests, insect control, insecticides, insect baits, insect repellents, cellulose, susceptibility, mortality, wood deterioration, biodegradation, insect food, aspen, pine, southern pines, wood preservatives, preserved wood, N'N-napthaloylhydroxylamine, termite control, NHA, resistance to decay, wood decay, preservation, treated wood, preservative treated wood, preservatives, decomposition of wood, mass loss rate, exposure tests, two-choice tests, choice test, feeding stimulant
- E1-09 Termite Choice Testing: What is it good for?
- Inhibition of termite damage by N`N-napthaloylhydroxyamine (NHA) : Reticulotermes flavipes (Kollar) vs. Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki
- Wood protection by commercial silver formulations against Eastern subterranean termites
XML: View XML