Skip to Main Content
Estimating the robustness of contingenet valuation estimates of WTP to survey mode and treatment of protest responses.Author(s): John Loomis; Armando Gonzalez-Caban; Joseph Champ
Source: In Bennett, J., 2011; editor, The International Handook on Non-market Environmental Evaluation. Northamptom, MS: Edward elgar Publishiing, Inc.; 398 p
Publication Series: Book
PDF: View PDF (756.12 KB)
DescriptionOver the past four decades teh contingent valuation method (CVM) has become a technique frequently used by economists to estimate willingness-to-pay (WTP) for improvements in environmental quality and prot3tion of natural resources. The CVM was originall applied to estmate recreation use values (Davis, 1963; Hammack and Brown, 1974)and air quality (Brookshire et al. 1982; Randall et al. 1974). In the second decade the CVM was extended to valuing the general public's option and existence values of environmental improvements (Walsh et al, 1984). As part of this evolution. the overall design of CVM studies now attempts to construct a market for teh public good (Carson, 1991). As such, a typical CVM survey describes the public good to be valued, how the good will be paid for (that is, payment vehicle), the WTP question format (that is, open ended or closed ended)and a rule for deciding whether the good will be supplied (for example, majority rule in referendum or total benefits exceed total cost). Each of these design elements has received substatntial testing to determine whether the CVM WTP estimation are sensitive to the payment vehicle or WTP question format (Boyle, 2003). The key concern of CVM regarding the validity of the WTP estimates has also received extensive testing from the early days of CVM (Bishop and Heberlein, 1979) to the more recent (Murphy et al., 2005). .
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationLoomis, J.; Gonzalez-Caban, A.; Champ, J. 2011. Estimating the robustness of contingenet valuation estimates of WTP to survey mode and treatment of protest responses. In 2011 Bennett, J., editor, The International Handook on Non-market Environmental Evaluation. Northamptom, MS: Edward elgar Publishiing, Inc.; Pp: 102-121
Keywordsenvironmental valuation, logit models, nonmaket valuation, surveys, valuation methods
- Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good?
- Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species
- Are all-terrain vehicle riders willing to pay trail user fees to ride on public lands in the USA?
XML: View XML