Skip to Main Content
Contingent valuation of fuel hazard reduction treatmentsAuthor(s): John B. Loomis; Armando Gonzalez-Caban
Source: In: Holmes, Thomas P.; Prestemon, Jeffrey P.; Abt, Karen L.(eds.). 2008. The economics of forest disturbances: Wilfires, storms, and invasive species. Springer Verlag. (79)III, 229-243.
Publication Series: Book
PDF: View PDF (5.14 MB)
DescriptionThis chapter presents a stated preference technique for estimating the public benefits of reducing wildfires to residents of California, Florida, and Montana from two alternative fuel reduction programs: prescribed burning, and mechanical fuels reduction. The two fuel reduction programs under study are quite relevant to people living in California, Florida, and Montana becasue of these state's frequent wildfires. The methodological approach demonstrated here has broad applicability to other fire prone areas of public land as well.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationLoomis, John B.; Gonzalez-Caban, Armando. 2008. Contingent valuation of fuel hazard reduction treatments. In: Holmes, Thomas P.; Prestemon, Jeffrey P.; Abt, Karen L.(eds.). 2008. The economics of forest disturbances: Wilfires, storms, and invasive species. Springer Verlag. Volume 79, III, 229-243.
Keywordsdichotomous choice, logit model, nonmarket valuation, willingness-to-pay
- Testing transferability of willingness to pay for forest fire prevention among three states of California, Florida and Montana
- Minority households’ willingness to pay for public and private wildfire risk reduction in Florida
- Willingness to pay function for two fuel treatments to reduce wildfire acreage burned: A scope test and comparison of White and Hispanic households
XML: View XML