Skip to Main Content
Anthropology and environmental policy: What counts?Author(s): Susan Charnley; William H. Durham
Source: American Anthropologist. 112(3): 397-415
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (3.13 MB)
DescriptionIn this article, we call for enhanced quantitative and environmental analysis in the work of environmental anthropologists who wish to influence policy. Using a database of 77 leading monographs published between 1967 and 2006, 147 articles by the same authors, and a separate sample of 137 articles from the journal Human Organization, we document a sharp decline over the last ten years in the collection and use of quantitative and environmental data within environmental anthropology. These declines come at the same time that environmental anthropologists are aiming at greater policy relevance. We use the case of the Polonoroeste Project in the Brazilian Amazon and its impact on World Bank policy as a concrete example of the advantages of fortifying the quantitative and environmental side of our work. We conclude by discussing ways to strengthen environmental anthropology to further enhance its policy relevance and impact.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCharnley, Susan; Durham, William H. 2010. Anthropology and environmental policy: What counts? American Anthropologist. 112(3): 397-415.
Keywordsenvironmental anthropology, environmental policy, quantitative methods, Amazonia, Polonoroeste
- Land Use Dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon
- Health, Supportive Environments, and the Reasonable Person Model
- Understanding community-forest relations.
XML: View XML