Skip to Main Content
Ability of institutions to address new challengesAuthor(s): B. Cashore; G. Galloway; F. Cubbage; D. Humphreys; P. Katila; K. Levin; A. Maryudi; C. McDermott; Kathleen McGinley
Source: Mery, G.; Katila, P.; Galloway, G.; Alfaro, R.I.; Kanninen, M.; Lobovikov, M.; J. Varjo, eds. Forests and Society: Responding to Global Drivers of Change. IUFRO World Forests, Society and Environment Project. Vienna: IUFRO
Publication Series: Other
Station: International Institute of Tropical Forestry
PDF: View PDF (701.0 KB)
DescriptionWhat types of institutional configurations hold the most promise in fostering efforts for long-term amelioration of enduring environmental, social, and economic challenges facing the world’s forests? This chapter presents, and applies an analytical framework with which to review research findings and analyses that shed light on what appear to be the most promising institutional settings with which to address these drivers, ameliorate problems, and encourage responsible and sustainable forest management around the globe. Our framework focuses attention on the shift from government to governance; political authority; disentangling abstract policy for specific requirements; and capacity enhancing knowledge-generating and administrative institutions. We reveal that the global nature of economic, social, and environmental demands on the world’s forests, and complex commercial trade relationships, require that we integrate analyses of domestic and local responses to assess the role of innovative regional and global institutions designed to address these “good governance” challenges. We conclude by calling for much greater attention to the potential of synergistic institutional intersection to respond to new and enduring challenges in ways that single interventions or institutions are unable to do so.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCashore, B.; Galloway, G.; Cubbage, F.; Humphreys, D.; Katila, P.; Levin, K.; Maryudi, A.; McDermott, C.; McGinley, K. 2010. Ability of institutions to address new challenges. Pages 441-486 in: Mery, G.; Katila, P.; Galloway, G.; Alfaro, R.I.; Kanninen, M.; Lobovikov, M.; J. Varjo, eds. Forests and Society: Responding to Global Drivers of Change. IUFRO World Forests, Society and Environment Project. Vienna: IUFRO
Keywordsforest governance institutions, FLEG-T, REDD, forest certification, tenure, research and capacity-building institutions, institutional intersection, multi-stakeholder dialogue
- Criterion 7: Legal, institutional, and economic framework for forest conservation and sustainable management
- Forest policy reform in Brazil
- Building social-ecological resilience through adaptive comanagement in the Cache River Watershed of southern Illinois
XML: View XML