Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): John B. Loomis; Hung Le Trong; Armando González-Cabán
    Date: 2009
    Source: In: González-Cabán, Armando. 2009. Proceedings of the third international symposium on fire economics, planning, and policy: common problems and approaches. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-227 (English). Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. pp. 169-176
    Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
    Station: Pacific Southwest Research Station
    PDF: View PDF  (325.05 KB)

    Description

    We estimate a marginal benefit function for using prescribed burning and mechanical fuel reduction programs to reduce acres burned by wildfire in three states. Since each state had different acre reductions, a statistically significant coefficient on the reduction in acres burned is also a split sample scope test frequently used as an indicator of the internal validity of contingent valuation surveys. In this paper the dichotomous contingent valuation method is used to test for scope of the sensitivity of respondent's willingness to pay for prescribed burning and mechanical fire fuel treatment programs to the acreage reduction of wildfires. The logit models were estimated for white and Hispanic households in California, Florida and Montana. The results of logit regressions show that the acreage reduction variable is statistically significant at the 1% level among proposed programs and groups of people. The positive sign of this variable means that the more acreage reduction is proposed, the more likely people would like to pay for the fire fuel reduction programs. Because of the significance of acreage reduction variable in the willingness to pay function, this function can be used to evaluate the incremental benefits of different forest fire management plans that reduce additional acres burned. These benefits could be used as budget justification for prescribed burning and mechanical fire fuel reduction programs to protect forests from wildfires.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to psw_communications@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Loomis, John B.; Le Trong, Hung; González-Cabán, Armando. 2009. Willingness-to-pay function for two fuel treatments to reduce wildfire acreage burned: A scope test and comparison of white and hispanic households. 2009. In: González-Cabán, Armando. 2009. Proceedings of the third international symposium on fire economics, planning, and policy: common problems and approaches. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-227 (English). Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. pp. 169-176.

    Keywords

    California, cotingent valuation, Fol rida, mechanical fire feul reduction, Montana, prescribed burning, scope test, willingness to pay

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/39099