Skip to Main Content
Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristicsAuthor(s): Gretchen G. Moisen; Tracey S. Frescino
Source: Ecological Modelling. 157: 209-225.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (2.1 MB)
DescriptionBroad-scale maps of forest characteristics are needed throughout the United States for a wide variety of forest land management applications. Inexpensive maps can be produced by modelling forest class and structure variables collected in nationwide forest inventories as functions of satellite-based information. But little work has been directed at comparing modelling techniques to determine which tools are best suited to mapping tasks given multiple objectives and logistical constraints. Consequently, five modelling techniques were compared for mapping forest characteristics in the Interior Western United States. The modelling techniques included linear models (LMs), generalized additive models (GAMs), classification and regression trees (CARTs), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and artificial neural networks (ANNs). Models were built for two discrete and four continuous forest response variables using a variety of satellite-based predictor variables within each of five ecologically different regions. All techniques proved themselves workable in an automated environment. When their potential mapping ability was explored through simulations, tremendous advantages were seen in use of MARS and ANN for prediction over LMs, GAMs, and CART. However, much smaller differences were seen when using real data. In some instances, a simple linear approach worked virtually as well as the more complex models, while small gains were seen using more complex models in other instances. In real data runs, MARS and GAMS performed (marginally) best for prediction of forest characteristics.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMoisen, Gretchen G.; Frescino, Tracey S. 2002. Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecological Modelling. 157: 209-225.
Keywordspredictive mapping, forest inventory, classification tree, regression tree, mulivariate adaptive regression spline, MARS, artificial neural network
- Mapping wildland fuels and forest structure for land management: a comparison of nearest neighbor imputation and other methods
- Predicting tree species presence and basal area in Utah: A comparison of stochastic gradient boosting, generalized additive models, and tree-based methods
- Comparison of dew point temperature estimation methods in Southwestern Georgia
XML: View XML