Skip to Main Content
Comparison of the arithmetic and geometric means in estimating crown diameter and crown cross-sectional areaAuthor(s): KaDonna Randolph
Source: South. J. Appl. For. 34(4):186-189
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: View PDF (93.1 KB)
DescriptionThe use of the geometric and arithmetic means for estimating tree crown diameter and crown cross-sectional area were examined for trees with crown width measurements taken at the widest point of the crown and perpendicular to the widest point of the crown. The average difference between the geometric and arithmetic mean crown diameters was less than 0.2 ft in absolute value. The mean difference between crown cross-sectional areas based on the geometric and arithmetic mean crown diameters was less than 6.0 ft2 in absolute value. At the plot level, the average difference between cumulative crown cross-sectional areas based on the geometric and arithmetic mean crown diameters amounted to less than 2.5% of the total plot area. The practical significance of these differences will depend on the final application in which the mean crown diameters are used.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationRandolph, K.C. 2011. Comparison of the arithmetic and geometric means in estimating crown diameter and crown cross-sectional area. South. J. Appl. For. 34(4):186-189.
Keywordsforest inventory, crown width, eccentricity, AM-GM inequality
- Using crown condition variables as indicators of forest health
- Coast redwood live crown and sapwood
- Accuracy and equivalence testing of crown ratio models and assessment of their impact on diameter growth and basal area increment predictions of two variants of the Forest Vegetation Simulator
XML: View XML