Skip to Main Content
Comparison of methods for estimating density of forest songbirds from point countsAuthor(s): Jennifer L. Reidy; Frank R. Thompson; J. Wesley Bailey
Source: Journal of Wildlife Management. 75(3): 558-568.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
View PDF (349.36 KB)
DescriptionNew analytical methods have been promoted for estimating the probability of detection and density of birds from count data but few studies have compared these methods using real data. We compared estimates of detection probability and density from distance and time-removal models and survey protocols based on 5- or 10-min counts and outer radii of 50 or 100 m. We surveyed singing male Acadian flycatchers (Empidonax virescens), cerulean warblers (Dendroica cerulea), Kentucky warblers (Oporornis formosus), Louisiana waterthrushes (Parkesia motacilla), wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina), and worm-eating warblers (Helmitheros vermivorum) in bottomland and upland forest across 5 states in the Central Hardwoods Bird Conservation Region during the breeding season in 2007 and 2008. Detection probabilities differed between distance and time-removal models and species detectabilities were affected differently by year, forest type, and state. Density estimates from distance models were generally higher than from time-removal models, resulting from lower detection probabilities estimated by distance models. We found support for individual heterogeneity (modeled as a finite mixture model) in the time-removal models and that 50-m radius counts generated density estimates approximately twice as high as 100-m radius counts. Users should be aware that in addition to estimating different components of detectability, density estimates derived from distance and time-removal models can be affected by survey protocol because some count durations and plot radii may better meet model assumptions than others. The choice of a method may not affect the use of estimates for relative comparisons (e.g., when comparing habitats) but could affect conclusions when used to estimate population size. We recommend careful consideration of assumptions when deciding on point-count protocol and selection of analysis methods.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationReidy, Jennifer L.; Thompson, Frank R., III; Bailey, J. Wesley. 2011. Comparison of methods for estimating density of forest songbirds from point counts. Journal of Wildlife Management. 75(3): 558-568.
Keywordsbottomland forest, central hardwoods, detectability, distance sampling, survey protocol, time-removal sampling, upland forest
- Breeding bird communities
- Effects of pine-oak woodland restoration on breeding bird densities in the Ozark-Ouachita Interior Highlands
- Avian community and microhabitat associations of Cerulean Warblers in Alabama
XML: View XML