Skip to Main Content
Cross-system comparisons elucidate disturbance complexities and generalitiesAuthor(s): Debra P.C. Peters; Ariel E. Lugo; F. Stuart Chapin; Steward T.A. Pickett; Michael Duniway; Adrian V. Rocha; Frederick J. Swanson; Christine Laney; Julia Jones
Source: Ecosphere. 2(7): 1-26
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (1.38 MB)
DescriptionGiven that ecological effects of disturbance have been extensively studied in many ecosystems, it is surprising that few quantitative syntheses across diverse ecosystems have been conducted. Multi-system studies tend to be qualitative because they focus on disturbance types that are difficult to measure in an ecologically relevant way. In addition, synthesis of existing studies across systems or disturbance types is challenging because sufficient information needed for analysis is not easily available. Theoretical advances and improved predictions can be advanced by generalizations obtained from synthesis activities that include multiple sites, ecosystems, and disturbance events. Building on existing research, we present a conceptual framework and an operational analog to integrate this rich body of knowledge and to promote quantitative comparisons of disturbance effects across different types of ecosystems and disturbances. This framework recognizes individual disturbance events that consist of three quantifiable components: (1) environmental drivers, (2) initial system properties, and (3) physical and biological mechanisms of effect, such as deposition, compaction, and combustion. These components result in biotic and abiotic legacies that can interact with subsequent drivers and successional processes to influence system response. Through time, a coarse-scale quasi-equilibrial state can be reached where variation in drivers interacting with biotic processes and feedbacks internal to the system results in variability in dynamics. At any time, a driver of sufficient magnitude can push the system beyond its realm of natural variability to initiate a new kind of event. We use long-term data from diverse terrestrial ecosystems to illustrate how our approach can facilitate cross-system comparisons, and provide new insights to the role of disturbance in ecological systems. We also provide key disturbance characteristics and measurements needed to promote future quantitative comparisons across ecosystems.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationPeters, Debra P.C.; Lugo, Ariel E.; Chapin, F. Stuart, III; Pickett, Steward T.A.; Duniway, Michael; Rocha, Adrian V.; Swanson, Frederick J.; Laney, Christine; Jones, Julia. 2011. Cross-system comparisons elucidate disturbance complexities and generalities. Ecosphere. 2(7): 1-26.
Keywordsdisturbance event, disturbance type, drought, ecological theory, global change, hurricane, legacies, overgrazing, thresholds, wildfire
- Cross-system comparisons elucidate disturbance complexities and generalities
- Necrobiome framework for bridging decomposition ecology of autotrophically and heterotrophically derived organic matter
- Characterization of ten extreme disturbance events in the context of social and ecological systems
XML: View XML