Skip to Main Content
What is limiting more flexible fire management—public or agency pressure?Author(s): Toddi A. Steelman; Sarah M. McCaffrey
Source: Journal of Forestry. 109(8):454-461.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (138.83 KB)
DescriptionConventional wisdom within American federal fire management agencies suggests that external influence such as community or political pressure for aggressive suppression are key factors circumscribing the ability to execute less aggressive fire management strategies. Thus, a better understanding of external constraints on fire management options is essential. This entails validating or refuting the perceptions of fire managers about the relative constraints that external pressures place on their ability to implement more flexible fire management options. In the summer of 2008, our research team traveled to two fires—the Gap in California and Gunbarrel in Wyoming—each of which used a different strategy for managing the fire. At each site, we interviewed key agency individuals and asked them about internal and external factors that influenced their fire management decisions. We also interviewed community members to understand whether they sought to influence fire management. Internal factors included procedural requirements and agency beliefs and attitudes. External factors included political and community pressures from the public who are often perceived to demand an aggressive suppression response. This article details how these internal and external factors influence flexibility in fire management. Our findings did not wholly support conventional wisdom and suggest that internal pressures are as important as external pressure in shaping fire management strategy.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSteelman, Toddi A.; McCaffrey, Sarah M. 2011. What is limiting more flexible fire management--public or agency pressure. Journal of Forestry. 109(8):454-461.
Keywordsfire management, political pressure, community pressure, wildfire costs, fire suppression, wildfire policy
- External human factors in incident management team decisionmaking and their effect on large fire suppression expenditures
- Fire social science research–selected highlights.
- Estimating US federal wildland fire managers' preferences toward competing strategic suppression objectives
XML: View XML