Skip to Main Content
Sugar Pine Seedlings not protected from blister rust by chemotherapeutantsAuthor(s): George M. Harvey
Source: Res. Note. PNW-RN-249. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Servivce, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 4 p.
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (187.34 KB)
DescriptionNone of several types of chemotherapeutants applied before inoculation (antibiotics, metallic salts, systemic fungicides) prevented infection of sugar pine seedlings by white pine blister rust. DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) did not enhance the action of any material with which it was applied.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHarvey, George M. 1975. Sugar Pine Seedlings not protected from blister rust by chemotherapeutants. Res. Note. PNW-RN-249. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Servivce, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 4 p.
KeywordsSugar pine, Pinus lambertiana, white pine blister rust, Cronartium ribicola, fungicides
- Sugar pine and its hybrids
- Sequence of the Sugar Pine Megagenome
- Strong partial resistance to white pine blister rust in sugar pine
XML: View XML