Skip to Main Content
Prognostic framing of stakeholders' subjectivities: A case of all-terrain vehicle management on state public landsAuthor(s): Stanley T. Asah; David N. Bengston; Keith Wendt; Leif DeVaney
Source: Environmental Management. 49: 192-206.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (267.03 KB)
DescriptionManagement of all-terrain vehicle (ATV) use on Minnesota state forest lands has a contentious history and land managers are caught between ATV riders, nonmotorized recreationists, private landowners, and environmental advocates. In this paper, we demonstrate the usefulness of framing distinct perspectives about ATV management on Minnesota state public forests, understand the structure of these management perspectives, identify areas of consensus and disagreement, specify which stakeholders hold the various perspectives, clarify stakeholder perceptions of other stakeholders, and explore the implications for ATV planning and management. Using Q methodology, three distinct perspectives about how we should or should not manage ATVs resulted from our analysis, labeled Expert Management, Multiple Use, and Enforcement and Balance. A surprising degree of unanimity among the three management perspectives was found. Although some of the areas of agreement would be difficult to implement, others would be relatively simple to put into place. We suggest that land managers focus on widely accepted management actions to ameliorate commonly recognized problems, which may ease tensions between stakeholders and make tackling the tougher issues easier.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationAsah, Stanley T.; Bengston, David N.; Wendt, Keith; DeVaney, Leif. 2012. Prognostic framing of stakeholders' subjectivities: A case of all-terrain vehicle management on state public lands. Environmental Management. 49: 192-206.
Keywordsconflict, ATV, Q methodology, consensus, stakeholders, prognostic framing
- Diagnostic reframing of intractable environmental problems: Case of a contested multiparty public land-use conflict
- Recreation-related perceptions of natural resource managers in the Saranac Lakes wild forest area
- Understanding social-ecological vulnerability with Q-methodology: A case study of water-based ecosystem services in Wyoming, USA
XML: View XML