Skip to Main Content
Comparative analysis of design codes for timber bridges in Canada, the United States, and EuropeAuthor(s): James Wacker; James (Scott) Groenier
Source: Transportation research record. No. 2200 (2010): p. 163-168.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Download Publication (470.87 KB)
DescriptionThe United States recently completed its transition from the allowable stress design code to the load and resistance factor design (LRFD) reliability-based code for the design of most highway bridges. For an international perspective on the LRFD-based bridge codes, a comparative analysis is presented: a study addressed national codes of the United States, Canada, and Europe. The study focused on codes related to timber bridges and involved the following parameters: organization format, superstructure types, loads, materials, design for bending, design for shear, deflection criteria, and durability requirements. The investigation found many similarities and some distinctive differences between the three bridge codes. Although the United States and Canada have different design load configurations, these result in similar bending moments and shear effects over a typical span range. However, the design load configuration in the European code produces bending moment and shear effects that are two to three times greater than the U.S. and Canadian levels. The comparative design of a glulam girder bridge revealed that the smallest beam size was required by the Canadian code and the largest was required by the European code.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWacker, James P.; Groenier, James (Scott). 2010. Comparative analysis of design codes for timber bridges in Canada, the United States, and Europe. Transportation research record. No. 2200 (2010): p. 163-168.
KeywordsBridges, design, construction, specifications, United States, Canada, Europe, live loads, testing, timber bridges, wooden bridges, CRFD, Eurocode, review article, building codes
- Designing timber bridge superstructures : a comparison of U.S. and Canadian bridge codes.
- Live load distribution on longitudinal glued-laminated timber deck bridges : final report : conclusions and recommendations
- Live-load distribution on glued-laminated timber girder bridges : final report : conclusions and recommendations
XML: View XML