Skip to Main Content
Patterns in the species-environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variablesAuthor(s): Samuel A. Cushman; Kevin McGarigal
Source: Oikos. 105: 117-124.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (286.6 KB)
DescriptionMulti-scale investigations of species/environment relationships are an important tool in ecological research. The scale at which independent and dependent variables are measured, and how they are coded for analysis, can strongly influence the relationships that are discovered. However, little is known about how the coding of the dependent variable set influences community-level analyses. In this study, we used canonical correspondence analysis to quantify species/environment relationships between environmental factors collected at three spatial scales and the structure of a forest bird community in the Oregon coast range. The main question in our analysis was how coding the bird data as abundance versus presence/absence affected the nature and strength of observed relationships. As we expected, the structure of the bird community was better described overall using abundance data than it was using presence/absence data. However, individual species and life-history groups appeared to exhibit different species /environment relationships in abundance versus presence/absence data. In particular, common species with a high frequency of occurrence among sample points exhibited a stronger 'abundance' signature, whereas uncommon species with a low frequency of occurrence exhibited a stronger 'presence/absence' signature. In addition, the apparent importance of plot-level factors in explaining the variation in the bird community was greater for abundance data, whereas patch and landscape factors were more important in the presence/absence data. Thus, conclusions about the relative importance of factors at different scales is largely contingent on the way in which the species-response data are coded for analysis. For communities as a whole, and for individual species within them, the strength and nature of species /environment relationships can differ dramatically between analyses using presence/absence versus abundance data.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCushman, Samuel A.; McGarigal, Kevin. 2004. Patterns in the species-environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables. Oikos. 105: 117-124.
Keywordsmulti-scale, species-environment relationship, spatial scales, presence/absence
- Using the spatial and spectral precision of satellite imagery to predict wildlife occurrence patterns.
- Invasive Species Distribution Modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?
- Seeing the forest and the trees: multilevel models reveal both species and community patterns
XML: View XML