Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Jeffrey M. Kane; J. Morgan Varner; Eric E. Knapp
    Date: 2010
    Source: Applied Vegetation Science 13:207-220
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    PDF: View PDF  (754.75 KB)

    Description

    Questions: What influence does mechanical mastication and other fuel treatments have on: (1) canopy and forest floor response variables that influence understory plant development; (2) initial understory vegetation cover, diversity, and composition; and (3) shrub and non-native species density in a secondgrowth ponderosa pine forest.

    Location: Challenge Experimental Forest, northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA.

    Methods: We compared the effects of mastication only, mastication with supplemental treatments (tilling and prescribed fire), hand removal, and a control on initial understory vegetation response using a randomized complete block experimental design. Each block (n54) contained all five treatments and understory vegetation was surveyed within 0.04-ha plots for each treatment.

    Results: While mastication alone and hand removal dramatically reduced the midstory vegetation, these treatments had little effect on understory richness compared with control. Prescribed fire after mastication increased native species richness by 150% (16.0 speciesm2) compared with control.However, this also increased non-native species richness (10.8 species m2) and shrub seedling density (124.7 stemsm2). Mastication followed by tilling resulted in increased non-native forb density (10.7 stemsm2).

    Conclusions: Mechanical mastication and hand removal treatments aided in reducing midstory fuels but did not increase understory plant diversity. The subsequent treatment of prescribed burning not only further reduced fire hazard, but also exposed mineral soil, which likely promoted native plant diversity. Some potential drawbacks to this treatment include an increase of non-native species and stimulation of shrub seed germination, which could alter ecosystem functions and compromise fire hazard reduction in the long-term.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Kane, Jeffrey M., J. Morgan Varner, Eric E. Knapp, and Robert F. Powers. 2010. Understory vegetation response to mechanical mastication and other fuels treatments in a ponderosa pine forest. Applied Vegetation Science 13:207-220.

    Keywords

    California, USA, Forest floor, Incorporation, Pinus ponderosa, Plant diversity, Prescribed fire, Sierra Nevada, Tilling.

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page