Evaluating the sufficiency of protected lands for maintaining wildlife population connectivity in the northern Rocky MountainsAuthor(s): Samuel A. Cushman; Erin L. Landguth; Curtis H. Flather
Source: Diversity and Distributions. 18: 873-884.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Download Publication (1004.0 KB)
Related Research Highlights
Scientists Evalute Connectivity of Wildlife Habitats in Northern Rockies
Aim: The goal of this study was to evaluate the sufficiency of the network of protected lands in the U.S. northern Rocky Mountains in providing protection for habitat connectivity for 105 hypothetical organisms. A large proportion of the landscape falls into one of several categories of protected lands. However, protected lands in the region are primarily higher elevation forest and mountain habitats. Little is known about how the network of protected lands may maintain connectivity for a broad spectrum of species expressing different habitat requirements and dispersal abilities. Location: The study was conducted across the states of Montana and northern Idaho, USA, comprising an area of 30.2 million hectares. Methods: We used resistant kernel modelling to map the extent of the study area predicted to be connected by dispersal for each of 35 species groups with different ecological associations. We evaluated the effect of vagility on protected area sufficiency by varying dispersal ability across three levels for each species group. We evaluated the degree of vulnerability of each of the 105 hypothetical species (35 species groups · 3 dispersal abilities) in terms of the extent of the total study area predicted to be connected by dispersal. We defined nine categories of risk as the combination of species vulnerability because of the extent of connected habitat and the degree to which that habitat was protected. Results: We found high variation in the vulnerability of species because of the extent of connected habitat, and the extent to which connected habitat overlapped protected lands. Species associated with high elevations and species associated with lower elevations were predicted to have limited extent of connected habitat. Species associated with high elevations were predicted to have the vast majority of their connected habitat protected by federal Forest Service and National Park Service lands. In contrast, species associated with lower elevations were poorly protected by the existing network of protected lands. Main conclusions: Low elevation and non-forest habitats are at highest risk of human-induced habitat loss and fragmentation in the study area. Conservation efforts in the region may be most effective if they focus on expanding the network of lower elevation protected lands in such a way that maximizes connectivity across the landscape.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCushman, Samuel A.; Landguth, Erin L.; Flather, Curtis H. 2012. Evaluating the sufficiency of protected lands for maintaining wildlife population connectivity in the northern Rocky Mountains. Diversity and Distributions. 18: 873-884.
Keywordsconnectivity, dispersal threshold, gap analysis, protected lands
- Multi-taxa population connectivity in the northern Rocky Mountains
- Ecological associations, dispersal ability, and landscape connectivity in the northern Rocky Mountains
- Assessing multi-taxa sensitivity to the human footprint, habitat fragmentation and loss by exploring alternative scenarios of dispersal ability and population size: A simulation approach
XML: View XML