Skip to Main Content
How did fixed-width buffers become standard practice for protecting freshwaters and their riparian areas from forest harvest practices?Author(s): John S. Richardson; Robert J. Naiman; Peter A. Bisson
Source: Freshwater Science. 31(1): 232-238
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (921.72 KB)
DescriptionRiparian buffers provide improved protection for water quality and biota, and narrow, fixed-width buffers of native vegetation along streams have been used to mitigate the effects of forest harvest at least since the 1960s. The practice of leaving unmanaged strips of vegetation along water courses in agricultural lands had been used before the 1960s in southern Europe and in eastern North America, but the scientific basis for leaving riparian buffers on forested lands came from observations in the coastal temperate rainforests of western North America. Those observations often were applied to other forested landscapes without further considerations. Fixed-width buffers are administratively simple to implement and assess, and have come to be the norm for streamside protection from forestry. Most guidelines for streamside protection allow some local modification for site and watershed-scale considerations, but frequently, the option to deviate from fixed-width buffers is not exercised because of uncertainty about outcomes. Few experiments have been done to test the efficacy of buffers of a particular width or of site- or landscape-specific modifications.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationRichardson, John S.; Naiman, Robert J.; Bisson, Peter A. 2012. How did fixed-width buffers become standard practice for protecting freshwaters and their riparian areas from forest harvest practices? Freshwater Science. 31(1): 232-238.
Keywordsforestry, riparian buffers, historical context, natural disturbance emulation
- Assessing the ecological benefits and opportunity costs of alternative stream management zone widths for eastern hardwoods
- Agricultural conservation practices and wetland ecosystem services in the wetland-rich Piedmont–Coastal Plain region
- Heed the head: buffer benefits along headwater streams
XML: View XML