Skip to Main Content
Understory light regimes following silvicultural treatments in central hardwood forests in Kentucky, USAAuthor(s): Stephen F. Grayson; David S. Buckley; Jason G. Henning; Callie J. Schweitzer; Kurt W. Gottschalk; David L. Loftis
Source: Forest Ecology and Management 279:66–76
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (844.88 KB)
DescriptionManipulation of the light regime is a primary goal of many silvicultural treatments, but the specific light conditions created remain poorly documented for many forest types and geographic locations. To help quantify effects of silvicultural treatments on light conditions, measurements of basal area, canopy cover, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), measured both instantaneously and across time, were collected in central hardwood forests in Kentucky, USA following silvicultural treatments. These measurements were used to: (1) Investigate the magnitudes of differences in understory percent ambient PAR following implementation of shelterwood with reserves and thinning treatments; (2) document the spatial and temporal distribution and variability of understory percent ambient PAR in shelterwood with reserves treatments (mean residual basal area = 5.2 m2/ha), thinning treatments (18.5 m2/ha), and untreated controls (27.1 m2/ha); and (3) examine relationships between: basal area and canopy cover; basal area and measured percent ambient PAR; and canopy cover and measured percent ambient PAR. Mean light levels from instantaneous measurements were 78% of ambient in the shelterwood with reserves, 33% of ambient in the thinning and 9% of ambient in the control. Similarly, only 1.3% of the approximately 140 h of PAR measurements in the controls indicated high light conditions (>60% of ambient), 15.9% in the thinning treatment and 65.4% in the shelterwood with reserves treatment. There were only 32 periods of high light found across all plots in the control, 176 periods of high light in the thinning treatment, and 441 periods of high light in the shelterwood with reserves treatment. Indexes of variability in light across time and among sampling locations within a stand did not differ statistically between the shelterwood with reserves and thinning treatments but both treatments were statistically more spatially and temporally variable than the uncut control. Simple linear regression relationships were observed between stand basal area and mean relative PAR (r2 = 0.8784 for instantaneous measurements, r2 = 0.9697 for continuous measurements), and basal area and canopy cover (r2 = 0.8479). Such relationships provide a means for including light management in forest planning and application of silvicultural treatments. The results for the distribution of light also suggest, however, that treated stands may have similar mean light levels, but differ substantially in the spatial and temporal distribution of light.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGrayson, Stephen F.; Buckley, David S.; Henning, Jason G.; Schweitzer, Callie J.; Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Loftis, David L. 2012. Understory light regimes following silvicultural treatments in central hardwood forests in Kentucky, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 279:66–76.
KeywordsLight, PAR, Canopy, Variability, Thinning, Shelterwood
- Practical field methods of estimating canopy cover, PAR, and LAI in Michigan Oak and pine stands
- Regeneration microsites and resource levels resulting from a range of silvicultural treatments in tennessee oak-hickory forests
- Response of sun-grown and shade-grown northern red oak seedlings to outplanting in clearcuts and shelterwoods in North Alabama
XML: View XML