Skip to Main Content
Balancing feasibility and precision of wildlife habitat analysis in planning for natural resourcesAuthor(s): Anita T. Morzillo; Joshua S. Halofsky; Jennifer DiMiceli; Blair Csuti; Pamela Comeleo; Miles Hemstrom
Source: In: Kerns, Becky K.; Shlisky, Ayn J.; Daniel, Colin J., tech. eds. Proceedings of the First Landscape State-and-Transition Simulation Modeling Conference, June 14–16, 2011, Portland, Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-869. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 103-114.
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (615.69 KB)
DescriptionWildlife conservation often is a central focus in planning for natural resource management. Evaluation of wildlife habitat involves balancing the desire for information about detailed habitat characteristics and the feasibility of completing analyses across large areas. Our objective is to describe tradeoffs made in assessments of wildlife habitat within a multiple-objective vegetation-based state-and-transition model (STM) framework. Species-habitat relationships derived from STM vegetation characteristics require careful interpretation for several reasons. First, the observational unit for wildlife analysis is habitat, which does not provide information about actual species occurrence or distribution. Second, subjectivity exists in researcher interpretation of species-habitat relationships derived from past literature, particularly qualitative descriptions. For quantified specieshabitat relationships that exist, only information that matches output criteria directly may be used for analysis. Third, visual interpretation of results may vary based on scale of analysis used in STMs. When preparing wildlife habitat information from STM output and its application to natural resource planning, there is a need to focus on consistent and defensible information and emphasize the limitations of knowledge derived from data analysis.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMorzillo, Anita T.; Halofsky, Joshua S.; DiMiceli, Jennifer; Csuti, Blair; Comeleo, Pamela; Hemstrom, Miles. 2012. Balancing feasibility and precision of wildlife habitat analysis in planning for natural resources. In: Kerns, Becky K.; Shlisky, Ayn J.; Daniel, Colin J., tech. eds. Proceedings of the First Landscape State-and-Transition Simulation Modeling Conference, June 14–16, 2011, Portland, Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-869. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 103-114.
Keywordsfuels management, habitat, land use planning, state-and-transition model, wildlife management.
- Chapter 5: Application of state-and-transition models to evaluate wildlife habitat
- Forecasting timber, biomass, and tree carbon pools with the output of state and transition models
- Chapter 2: Dynamic vegetation modeling of forest, woodland, shrubland, and grassland vegetation communities in the Pacific Northwest and Southwest Regions of the United States
XML: View XML