Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Dale G. BrockwayKenneth W Outcalt
    Date: 2005
    Source: In: National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study for Ecosystem Restoration, Fuel Treatments Workshop: 38-48.
    Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
    Station: Southern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (1.92 MB)


    The principal objective is to quantify the responses of the understory plant community to fire and fire surrogate treatments, specifically plant species composition, foliar cover, species richness, diversity, and evenness changes resulting from (1) fire exclusion in the untreated control, (2) prescribed fire, (3) thinning, (4) thinning plus prescribed fire, and (5) herbicide plus prescribed fire. The study should identify the individual species and groups of plants that are most affected (both positively and negatively) by the experimental treatments. The most effective treatments for mitigating the wildfire hazard and restoring the natural structure and function of longleaf pine forests appear to be the thinning+fire treatments. Both are very effective in rapidly establishing the appropriate stand architecture that then facilitates the safe application of periodic surface fires to achieve and maintain overall forest health. Application of these two treatments also enhances habitat quality by promoting the re-establishment and expansion of native grasses and forbs in the understory plant community. The only noteworthy disadvantage of the herbicide+fire treatment is the decline in understory plants during the period immediately following herbicide application. Fortunately, these resilient ecosystems rapidly recover from this transitory impact. Although the fire treatment is also of some value, it produces results that appear to be less consistently beneficial across the full range of plant groups. While thinning was thought to perhaps serve as a surrogate for prescribed fire, it is now recognized that its effects and benefits are ephemeral and easily lost once woody vegetation regrows to occupy an even greater proportion of the site. Thus, thinning that is not rapidly followed up (in perhaps no more than one year) with prescribed fire is of little value in mitigating wildfire danger or contributing to the aims of ecological restoration.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Brockway, Dale G.; Outcalt, Kenneth W. 2005. Understory vegetation response in longleaf pine forests to fire and fire surrogate treatments for wildfire hazard reduction and ecological restoration. In: National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study for Ecosystem Restoration, Fuel Treatments Workshop: 38-48.


    longleaf pine, fire, fire surrogates, understory response

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page