Skip to Main Content
Indiana residents' perceptions of woodland managementAuthor(s): Daniel J. Witter; Shannon M. Amberg; David J. Case; Phillip T. Seng
Source: In: Swihart, Robert K.; Saunders, Michael R.; Kalb, Rebecca A.; Haulton, G. Scott; Michler, Charles H., eds. 2013. The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-108. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 24-34.
Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (734.8 KB)
DescriptionA 2009 telephone survey of 1,402 Indiana adults was conducted to assess opinions regarding woodland management. Forty-eight percent said they were "very concerned" about the health and productivity of Indiana's woodlands, and 45 percent, "somewhat concerned." Almost half (47 percent) thought that the state's woodlands are held in about "equal government and private ownership," and 26 percent thought most woodlands are "government" owned (in fact, roughly 85 percent of the state's forest lands are privately owned). When informed that "Indiana's State Forest System makes up about 3 percent of Indiana woodlands," a majority (55 percent) thought that this amount was "not enough," and 39 percent, "about right." Forest practices receiving majority approval were: "removing some trees to protect Indiana woodlands from spread of disease and wildfire" (95 percent), "harvesting Indiana trees for woodland management if overseen by professional foresters" (85 percent), "harvesting Indiana trees to improve places for wildlife to live" (82 percent), "advising Indiana private landowners on how many and what kinds of trees they might harvest and sell" (70 percent), and "harvesting Indiana trees to make lumber or other wood products that we use" (61 percent). Majority agreement was given to the statement, "Indiana woodlands should be managed for a balance of wood products that we use, and other benefits like recreation, wildlife, and good water quality" (88 percent). Nearly three-fourths (72 percent) agreed with the statement, "The amount of forested land in Indiana is shrinking," and respondents identified "urban sprawl" as the highest-ranking threat to Indiana woodlands.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationWitter, Daniel J.; Amberg, Shannon M.; Case, David J.; Seng, Phillip T. 2013. Indiana residents' perceptions of woodland management. In: Swihart, Robert K.; Saunders, Michael R.; Kalb, Rebecca A.; Haulton, G. Scott; Michler, Charles H., eds. 2013. The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-108. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 24-34.
Keywordsbats, beetles, birds, Central Hardwoods, experiment, forest management, human attitudes, Indiana, moths, oak, reptiles, salamanders, silviculture, small mammals, wildlife
- The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management
- Indiana forest management history and practices
- Social and biophysical variation in regional timber harvest regimes
XML: View XML