Skip to Main Content
Public acceptability of forest management practices at Morgan-Monroe State ForestAuthor(s): Shannon C. Rogers; William L. Hoover; Shorna B. Allred
Source: In: Swihart, Robert K.; Saunders, Michael R.; Kalb, Rebecca A.; Haulton, G. Scott; Michler, Charles H., eds. 2013. The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-108. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 254-286.
Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (6.28 MB)
DescriptionForest management practices on public forests are controversial with many organizational and individual stakeholders. Forest managers' understanding of the attitudes of stakeholders is necessary to honor statutory requirements and the social contract under which they operate. The human dimension component of the Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment (HEE) in Indiana included a study of recreationists' and neighboring landowners' forest management attitudes by examining the acceptability of alternative management practices on Morgan-Monroe State Forest (MMSF) before and after providing brief explanations of alternative management practices. An on-site survey of recreationists and a mail survey of landowners neighboring MMSF were used. Both surveys also included an investigation of the influence of information about timber management practices on respondents' attitudes. As expected, as forest stand density increased, so did the acceptability of management practices, desirability of forest scenes, and likelihood of visiting managed forests for both recreationists and neighboring landowners. Results indicate that informational interventions had a statistically significant influence on the acceptability of forest management practices, but the practical change in attitudes was small. Ordinal regression models indicated that landowner attitudes about the benefits derived by harvesting timber had a small influence on the acceptability of some treatments. It is arguable whether the increase in the acceptability of forest practices resulting from informational intervention is large enough to change stakeholders' positions regarding how MMSF should be managed.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationRogers, Shannon C.; Hoover, William L.; Allred, Shorna B. 2013. Public acceptability of forest management practices at Morgan-Monroe State Forest. In: Swihart, Robert K.; Saunders, Michael R.; Kalb, Rebecca A.; Haulton, G. Scott; Michler, Charles H., eds. 2013. The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-108. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 254-286.
Keywordsbats, beetles, birds, Central Hardwoods, experiment, forest management, human attitudes, Indiana, moths, oak, reptiles, salamanders, silviculture, small mammals, wildlife
- The Hardwood Ecosystem Experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management
- Value of the Morgan-Monroe-Yellowwood State Forest Complex
- Forest aesthetics, biodiversity, and the perceived appropriateness of ecosystem management practices
XML: View XML