Skip to Main Content
A Comparison of Snap Traps for Evaluating Small Mammal PopulationsAuthor(s): Roger W. Perry; Philip A. Tappe; David G. Peitz; Ronald E. Thill; M. Anthony Melchoirs; T. Bently Wigley
Source: Proceedings of the annual conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 50: 280-286.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: Download Publication (149 KB)
DescriptionThe authors compared rat, mouse, and museum special snap traps to determine if differences existed in capture efficiency of small mammals and whether type of trap affected indices of richness, evenness, and diversity. Small mammals were trapped in 57 streamside study areas in 1990 to 1995 in the Ouachita Mountains, AR. Efficiency of mouse traps was equal to or greater than that of museum special traps in capturing a small mammal species. Rat traps were most efficient for capturing the 2 largest small mammal species recorded, the eastern wood rat (Neotoma floridana) and the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus). The authors found no difference among the types of traps in their susceptibility to being inadvertently sprung by extrinsic factors such as rain. Mean species richness, evenness, and diversity did not differ among trap types. A combination of mouse and rat traps increased species richness and diversity over mouse traps alone. A combination of mouse, rat, and museum special traps did not greatly increase any community measure relative to the mouse and rat trap combination. The scientists conclude that use of museum special traps for sampling small mammals is unnecessary unless the objective is to acquire museum specimens.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationPerry, Roger W.; Tappe, Philip A.; Peitz, David G.; Thill, Ronald E.; Melchoirs, M. Anthony; Wigley, T. Bently. 1996. A Comparison of Snap Traps for Evaluating Small Mammal Populations. Proceedings of the annual conference of Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 50: 280-286.
- The effect of habitat patch size on small mammal populations
- Small mammal distributions relative to corridor edges within intensively managed southern pine plantations.
- Effects of clearcutting with corridor retention on abundance, richness, and diversity of small mammals in the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, USA.
XML: View XML