Skip to Main Content
Comparison of three site preparation techniques on growth of planted loblolly pine 6 years after a southern pine beetle epidemicAuthor(s): Wayne K. Clatterbuck; Michael Carr
Source: In: Guldin, James M., ed. 2013. Proceedings of the 15th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-175. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 13-16.
Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (41.28 KB)
DescriptionThree site preparation treatments: (1) complete removal of woody debris—drum chopped, raked, and disked; (2) drum chopping leaving woody debris; and (3) no site preparation—planting among dead standing trees were compared by evaluating the growth and survival of planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) after six growing seasons following a southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann) epidemic. Each treatment was replicated three times at one location on the Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee. Each treatment had the same number of planted seedlings (681) per acre, and was sprayed with herbicide to control hardwood residuals before planting and to release seedlings one growing season after planting. Results indicate that the growth (height and diameter) of seedlings was not significantly different between the treatments. However, survival was only slightly, but significantly different, for the no-mechanical-site-preparation (standing-dead) treatment which may be a reflection of difficult planting conditions. A cost evaluation of the different site preparation treatments is also discussed.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationClatterbuck, Wayne K.; Carr, Michael. 2013. Comparison of three site preparation techniques on growth of planted loblolly pine 6 years after a southern pine beetle epidemic. In: Guldin, James M., ed. 2013. Proceedings of the 15th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-175. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 13-16.
- Growth and Fusiform Rust Responses of Piedmont Loblolly Pine After Severa1 Site Preparation and Regeneration Methods
- Competition After Windrowing or Single-Roller Chopping For Site Preparation in the Southern Piedmont
- Recording dew gage
XML: View XML