Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Richard Cutler; Leslie Brown; James Powell; Barbara Bentz; Adele Cutler
    Date: 2003
    Source: In: Braverman, A.; Hesterberg, T.; Minnotte, M.; Symanzik, J.; Said, Y., eds. Computing Science and Statistics, Volume 35: Security and Infrastructure Protection. Proceedings of the 35th Symposium on the Interface; March 13-17; Salt Lake City, Utah. Fairfax Station, VA: Interface Foundation of North America, Inc. Online: http://www.interfacesymposia.org/I03/index.html
    Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
    Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
    PDF: View PDF  (388.55 KB)

    Description

    Mountain pine beetles (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) are a pest indigenous to the pine forests of the western United States. Capable of exponential population growth, mountain pine beetles can destroy thousands of acres of trees in a short period of time. The research reported here is part of a larger project to demonstrate the application of, and evaluate, differential equation models for mountain pine beetle progression through pine forests. The study area is the Sawtooth National Recreation Area in Idaho. To provide input parameters to the mathematical models, and to measure the bark beetle impact (redtopped pines), IKONOS satellite imagery was used to classify the vegetation of the study area. Five classifiers - linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor discrminant analysis, classification trees and random forests - were applied to raw and transformed multispectral and panchromatic satellite imagery, with and without an elevation variable. Quadratic discrmininant analysis and random forests proved to be the best classifiers as measured by cross-validated error estimates, with overall misclassification rates were about 12% without elevation, and about 5% when elevation was included. Redtops were relatively easy to identify, with misclassification rates of about 5%-6%, but green lodgepole pine and Douglas fir were relatively difficult to discrminiate between and had much higher misclassification rates.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Cutler, Richard; Brown, Leslie; Powell, James; Bentz, Barbara; Cutler, Adele. 2003. Identifying "redtops": Classification of satellite imagery for tracking mountain pine beetle progression through a pine forest. In: Braverman, A.; Hesterberg, T.; Minnotte, M.; Symanzik, J.; Said, Y., eds. Computing Science and Statistics, Volume 35: Security and Infrastructure Protection. Proceedings of the 35th Symposium on the Interface; March 13-17; Salt Lake City, Utah. Fairfax Station, VA: Interface Foundation of North America, Inc. Online: http://www.interfacesymposia.org/I03/index.html

    Keywords

    mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae, IKONOS, satellite imagery

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page