Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): W. J. Massman; J. M. Frank; A. E. Jimenez Esquilin; M. E. Stromberger; W. D. Shepperd
    Date: 2006
    Source: In: 27th Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Paper 2.2. Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. Online: https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/111082.pdf
    Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
    Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (958.0 KB)

    Description

    Thinning of forest stands is frequently used to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire. But thinning requires that the refuse (or slash) be removed from the site, which can be done either by burning it or by mastication and dispersal. Either method has long term consequences to the soil and to soil moisture and soil CO2 levels. For example, after the initial drying of the soil by a fire, soil moisture in burned areas tends to exceed that of unburned areas because the loss of vegetation reduces or eliminates transpiration (Neary and Ffolliott, 2005). This situation may persist until the vegetation is reestablished. In general, burning also tends to reduce soil respiration (Amiro et al., 2003) and, therefore, soil CO2 amounts and fluxes. Nevertheless, some environmental conditions will allow the soil respiration of a burned area to exceed that of an unburned area (Andersson et al., 2004). In fact, exposing soil to a severe fire may actually increase heterotrophic respiration (Bisset and Parkinson, 1980; Richter et al., 2000). In this situation the consequences to soil CO2 and soil fluxes is less clear because nearby unburned areas may still support autotrophic respiration. This increase in heterotrophic respiration in the burned area is thought to result from the stimulation of the soil microbiota by increased soil temperatures (Bisset and Parkinson, 1980; Richter et al., 2000) and/or elevated levels of bioavailable nutrients (Fyles et al., 2001; Choromanska and DeLuca, 2002; Certini, 2005).

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Massman, W. J.; Frank, J. M.; Jimenez Esquilin, A. E.; Stromberger, M. E.; Shepperd, W. D. 2006. Long term consequences of a controlled slash burn and slash mastication to soil moisture and CO2 at a southern Colorado site. In: 27th Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Paper 2.2. Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. Online: https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/111082.pdf

    Keywords

    fire, thinning, slash burn, slash mastication, soil moisture, CO2

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/43510