Skip to Main Content
Breakthrough at the Missouri River Breaks: A quick tool for comparing burned and unburned sitesAuthor(s): Rachael Clark; Theresa Jain
Source: Fire Science Brief. 73: 1-6.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
PDF: View PDF (473.17 KB)
DescriptionA quantitative understanding of how forests work, both before and after (prescribed and wild) fire, is essential to management. Yet acquiring the kind of broad yet detailed information needed for many management decisions can be costly, tedious, and time-consuming. After two sweeping wildfires in the Missouri River Breaks area of eastern Montana - the Indian and Germaine wildfires - some researchers wanted to see whether it was possible to characterize both pre-fire and post-fire characteristics in a relatively inexpensive and efficient way. Specifically, they wanted to know whether prescribed fire that is then followed by wildfire, is more likely to meet management objectives.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationClark, Rachael; Jain, Theresa. 2009. Breakthrough at the Missouri River Breaks: A quick tool for comparing burned and unburned sites. Fire Science Brief. 73: 1-6.
Keywordsprescribed fire, wildfire, Missouri River Breaks, Montana
- Issues in evaluating the costs and benefits of fuel treatments to reduce wildfire in the Nation's forests.
- Fire effects on the cheatgrass seed bank pathogen Pyrenophora semeniperda
- Economic optimisation of wildfire intervention activities
XML: View XML