Skip to Main Content
Fuel treatments and fire severity: A meta-analysisAuthor(s): Erik J. Martinson; Philip N. Omi
Source: Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-103WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 38 p.
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Download Publication (2.29 MB)
DescriptionWe employed meta-analysis and information theory to synthesize findings reported in the literature on the effects of fuel treatments on subsequent fire intensity and severity. Data were compiled from 19 publications that reported observed fire responses from 62 treated versus untreated contrasts. Effect sizes varied widely and the most informative grouping of studies distinguished three vegetation types and three types of fuel treatment. The resultant meta-analytic model is highly significant (p<0.001) and explains 78% of the variability in reported observations of fuel treatment effectiveness. Our synthesis highlights several considerations that both support and inform the current fuels management paradigm.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationMartinson, Erik J.; Omi, Philip N. 2013. Fuel treatments and fire severity: A meta-analysis. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-103WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 38 p.
Keywordsthinning, prescribed burning, wildfire, effect size, synthesis
- The evaluation of meta-analysis techniques for quantifying prescribed fire effects on fuel loadings.
- Assessing mitigation of wildfire severity by fuel treatments - An example from the coastal plain of Mississippi
- Riparian fuel treatments in the western USA: Challenges and considerations
XML: View XML