Skip to Main Content
Evaluation of road approaches to four different types of stream crossings in the Virginia PiedmontAuthor(s): Matthew B. Carroll; W. Michael Aust; C. Andrew Dolloff; Robert M. Shaffer
Source: In: Guldin, James M., ed. 2013. Proceedings of the 15th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-175. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 395-398.
Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
Station: Southern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (81.88 KB)
DescriptionErosion potential was estimated for road approaches during 4 phases of a timber harvesting scheduled for 23 stream crossings in the Virginia Piedmont. The objectives of this study were to: (1) examine four different types of stream crossing structures (steel bridges, pole bridges, standard culverts, and reenforced fords) in order to determine if the type of stream crossing affects erosion potential and (2) evaluate the potential erosion associated with the stream crossing approaches using the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) for forest roads and the forestry version of the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). An unbalanced replication resulted in six replications of each crossing, except pole bridges (7) and fords (4). Results indicate that any of the stream crossings may be appropriate if located, installed, and maintained properly. However, we found that approaches associated with culverts had the potential for the highest soil loss rates as estimated by both WEPP (46.2 tons per acre per year) and USLE (85.8 tons per acre per year). Both of these models showed a general decrease in the potential for erosion from the during harvest phase to the postroad closure phase.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCarroll, Matthew B.; Aust, W. Michael; Dolloff, C. Andrew; Shaffer, Robert M. 2013. Evaluation of road approaches to four different types of stream crossings in the Virginia Piedmont. In: Guldin, James M., ed. 2013. Proceedings of the 15th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. e-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR-175. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 395-398.
- Recent findings related to measuring and modeling forest road erosion
- Effectiveness of forestry BMPS for stream crossing sediment reduction using rainfall simulation
- Seasonal change of WEPP erodibility parameters for two fallow plots on a palouse silt loam
XML: View XML