Skip to Main Content
Diversifying the composition and structure of managed late-successional forests with harvest gaps: What is the optimal gap size?Author(s): Christel C. Kern; Anthony W. D’Amato; Terry F. Strong
Source: Forest Ecology and Management. 304: 110-120.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
Download Publication (873.49 KB)
DescriptionManaging forests for resilience is crucial in the face of uncertain future environmental conditions. Because harvest gap size alters the species diversity and vertical and horizontal structural heterogeneity, there may be an optimum range of gap sizes for conferring resilience to environmental uncertainty. We examined the impacts of different harvest gap sizes on structure and composition in northern hardwood forests of the upper Great Lakes region, USA using a robustly-designed experiment consisting of six harvest gap sizes replicated 12 times with over a decade of repeated measurements. We found that germinant (trees < 0.15 m tall) densities were greatest in year 2 (71.6 stems m-2) but were present in all measurement years (0, 2, 6, and 12 years post-harvest), suggesting a continuous influx of tree seedlings on site. Sapling (>0.6 m tall) densities were greatest (3.9 stems m-2) at the end of the study period (year 12) and were composed primarily of three species (Acer saccharum, Fraxinus americana, Ostrya virginiana) already present on site. The 6 and 10 m diameter (dia.) harvest gaps had, on average, the minimum number of saplings (~2 stems m-2) needed to fill dominant positions in small canopy openings, but, by year 12, small gaps were closed by crown extension of mature edge trees. Medium (20 m dia.) to large harvest gaps (30 and 46 m dia.) had fewer saplings than small gaps. The understory layer of medium and large gaps were dominated by shrubs (Rubus sp.) that dampened growth of species such as F. americana. Consequently, gap-filling from the sapling layer would not occur in the near future, and, from a management perspective, would be considered a regeneration failure within larger gaps. Our study suggests that the optimum gap size does not exist and using harvest gaps to create resilient forests with structural and compositional diversity alone is challenging on productive habitats. In particular, medium to large gaps will likely require microsite specific placement of desired advance regeneration or additional treatments (e.g., vegetation control) to cultivate a dense sapling layer in an acceptable timeframe after harvest.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKern, Christel C.; D’Amato, Anthony W.; Strong, Terry F. 2013. Diversifying the composition and structure of managed late-successional forests with harvest gaps: What is the optimal gap size? Forest Ecology and Management. 304: 110-120.
KeywordsUneven-aged management, Selection system, Tree recruitment, Shrub interference, Microclimatic extremes, Sugar maple
- Initial tree regeneration response to natural-disturbance-based silviculture in second-growth northern hardwood forests
- Volume tables for important second-growth northern hardwood forests in northeastern Wisconsin
- The Influence of Residual Stand Densities on Regeneration in Sugar Maple Stands
XML: View XML