Skip to Main Content
Comparisons of modeled height predictions to ocular height estimatesAuthor(s): W.A. Bechtold; S.J. Zarnoch; W.G. Burkman
Source: Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 22(4): 216-221.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: Download Publication (195 KB)
DescriptionEquations used by USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis projects to predict individual tree heights on the basis of species and d.b.h. were improved by the addition of mean overstory height. However, ocular estimates of total height by field crews were more accurate than the statistically improved models, especially for hardwood species. Height predictions from the improved equations attained the desired measurement quality objective only 57 percent of the time, while ocular estimates achieved the desired accuracy 75 percent of the time.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBechtold, W.A.; Zarnoch, S.J.; Burkman, W.G. 1998. Comparisons of modeled height predictions to ocular height estimates. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 22(4): 216-221.
- Regional height-diameter equations for major tree species of southwest Oregon.
- A 3-point derivation of dominant tree height equations
- Effects of height imputation strategies on stand volume estimation
XML: View XML