Skip to Main Content
Cultural practices for prevention and control of mountain pine beetle infestationsAuthor(s): Christopher J. Fettig; Kenneth E. Gibson; A. Steven Munson; Jose F. Negrón
Source: Forest Science. 60(3): 450–463
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
View PDF (158.0 KB)
Related Research Highlights
Synthesis Paper on the Mountain Pine Beetle Biology and Management Now Available
DescriptionIn recent years, the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, has impacted >8.9 million hectares of forests in the western United States. During endemic populations, trees weakened by other agents are often colonized by D. ponderosae but may be difficult to detect due to their scarcity. Once populations reach incipient levels, tree defenses are often insufficient in deterring mass attacks, and populations rapidly increase causing substantial levels of tree mortality under certain circumstances. There are two general approaches for reducing the negative impacts of D. ponderosae on forests. Direct control involves short-term tactics designed to address current infestations by manipulating beetle populations and includes the use of fire, insecticides, semiochemicals, sanitation harvests, or combinations of these treatments. Indirect control is preventive and designed to reduce the probability and severity of future infestations by manipulating stand, forest and/or landscape conditions by reducing the number of susceptible host trees through thinning, prescribed burning, and/or alterations of age classes and species composition. We review tree, stand, and landscape factors associated with D. ponderosae infestations and analyze the effectiveness of treatments for preventing and mitigating undesirable levels of tree mortality. We describe the current state of our knowledge and identify gaps for making informed management decisions.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationFettig, C.J.; Gibson, K.E.; Munson, A.S.; Negrón, J.F. 2014. Cultural practices for prevention and mitigation of mountain pine beetle infestations. Forest Science. 60(3): 450–463.
KeywordsDendroctonus ponderosae, direct control, indirect control, Pinus contorta, Pinus ponderosa
- A comment on “Management for mountain pine beetle outbreak suppression: Does relevant science support current policy?"
- Mountain pine beetle dynamics and reproductive success in post-fire lodgepole and ponderosa pine forests in northeastern Utah
- Mountain pine beetle host selection between lodgepole and ponderosa pines in the southern Rocky Mountains
XML: View XML