Skip to Main Content
The birth and fate of new generic namesAuthor(s): D. Jean Lodge; Andrus. Voitk
Source: Omphalina. 5(1) 1:8-12.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (445.89 KB)
DescriptionNo student of natural history can have escaped the proliferation of new names in the last few decades, certainly evident in mycology. Of course, the most obvious need for a new name comes about when an organism is discovered whose existence was hitherto unknown, i.e. a species, genus, or larger group new to science. However, for the layman the sudden profusion of new names for seemingly old organisms or groups of organisms is causing some confusion and consternation, particularly when several names replace a former single name. In this discussion we shall use genera as an example to show how new names (new genera) come about and what happens to them after introduction.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationLodge, D. Jean; Voitk, Andrus. 2014. The birth and fate of new generic names. 2014. Omphalina. 5(1) 1:8-12.
- The splitting of Hygrocybe
- Two new genera and twelve new species of Graphidaceae from Puerto Rico: a case for higher endemism of lichenized fungi in islands of the Caribbean?
- Assisted diversification for an era of habitat extinction
XML: View XML