Skip to Main Content
A comparison of selected parametric and non-parametric imputation methods for estimating forest biomass and basal areaAuthor(s): Donald Gagliasso; Susan Hummel; Hailemariam Temesgen
Source: Open Journal of Forestry. 4(1): 42-48
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Pacific Northwest Research Station
PDF: View PDF (157.75 KB)
DescriptionVarious methods have been used to estimate the amount of above ground forest biomass across landscapes and to create biomass maps for specific stands or pixels across ownership or project areas. Without an accurate estimation method, land managers might end up with incorrect biomass estimate maps, which could lead them to make poorer decisions in their future management plans. The goal of this study was to compare various imputation methods to predict forest biomass and basal area, at a project planning scale (<20,000 acres) on the Malheur National Forest, located in eastern Oregon, USA. We examined the predictive performance of linear regression, geographic weighted regression (GWR), gradient nearest neigh-bor (GNN), most similar neighbor (MSN), random forest imputation, and k-nearest neighbor (k-nn) to estimate biomass (tons/acre) and basal area (sq. feet per acre) across 19,000 acres on the Malheur National Forest. To test the different methods, a combination of ground inventory plots, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data, satellite imagery, and climate data was analyzed, and their root mean square error (RMSE) and bias were calculated. Results indicate that for biomass prediction, the k-nn (k = 5) had the lowest RMSE and least amount of bias. The second most accurate method consisted of the k-nn (k = 3), followed by the GWR model, and the random forest imputation. For basal area prediction, the GWR model had the lowest RMSE and least amount of bias. The second most accurate method was k-nn (k = 5), followed by k-nn (k = 3), and the random forest method. For both metrics, the GNN method was the least accurate based on the ranking of RMSE and bias.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGagliasso, Donald; Hummel, Susan; Temesgen, Hailemariam. 2014. A comparison of selected parametric and non-parametric imputation methods for estimating forest biomass and basal area. Open Journal of Forestry. 4(1): 42-48.
Keywordsgradient nearest neighbor, most similar neighbor, K-nearest neighbor, random forest, geographic weighted regression, biomass, LiDAR
- Tree-level imputation techniques to estimate current plot-level attributes in the Pacific Northwest using paneled inventory data
- A Comparison of the Spatial Linear Model to Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) Methods for Forestry Applications
- Imputed forest structure uncertainty varies across elevational and longitudinal gradients in the western Cascade mountains, Oregon, USA
XML: View XML