Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub

    Description

    Many new methods for sampling down coarse woody debris have been proposed in the last dozen or so years. One of the most promising in terms of field application, perpendicular distance sampling (PDS), has several variants that have been progressively introduced in the literature. In this study, we provide an overview of the different PDS variants and comprehensive comparison of their associated estimator performance. Additionally, two new variants and their estimators are introduced to the existing pool. Simulations are used to determine the efficiency of competing protocols and associated estimators. The simulation results corroborate the theoretical unbiasedness of the estimators for PDS in all forms. In addition, while there is some difference in variance among the protocols, the overall difference is small, and depends on the attribute to be estimated. Therefore, the choice of which PDS variant to use in field applications will depend on the field conditions and attributes to be estimated.

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Gove, Jeffrey H.; Ducey, Mark J.; Valentine, Harry T.; Williams, Michael S. 2013. A comprehensive comparison of perpendicular distance sampling methods for sampling downed coarse woody debris. Forestry. 86(1): 129-143.

    Cited

    Google Scholar

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/46055