Skip to Main Content
Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systemsAuthor(s): Michael Köhl; Andrew Lister; Charles T. Scott; Thomas Baldauf; Daniel Plugge
Source: Carbon Balance and Management. 6:10.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
View PDF (531.77 KB)
DescriptionCountries willing to adopt a REDD regime need to establish a national Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system that provides information on forest carbon stocks and carbon stock changes. Due to the extensive areas covered by forests the information is generally obtained by sample based surveys. Most operational sampling approaches utilize a combination of earth-observation data and in-situ field assessments as data sources. We compared the cost-efficiency of four different sampling design alternatives (simple random sampling, regression estimators, stratified sampling, 2-phase sampling with regression estimators) that have been proposed in the scope of REDD. Three of the design alternatives provide for a combination of in-situ and earth-observation data. Under different settings of remote sensing coverage, cost per field plot, cost of remote sensing imagery, correlation between attributes quantified in remote sensing and field data, as well as population variability and the percent standard error over total survey cost was calculated. The cost-efficiency of forest carbon stock assessments is driven by the sampling design chosen. Our results indicate that the cost of remote sensing imagery is decisive for the cost-efficiency of a sampling design. The variability of the sample population impairs cost-efficiency, but does not reverse the pattern of cost-efficiency of the individual design alternatives.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKöhl, Michael; Lister, Andrew; Scott, Charles T.; Baldauf, Thomas; Plugge, Daniel. 2011. Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems. Carbon Balance and Management. 6:10.
- Avoiding treatment bias of REDD+ monitoring by sampling with partial replacement
- Local involvement in measuring and governing carbon stocks in China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Laos
- Accuracy assessment with complex sampling designs
XML: View XML