Skip to Main Content
Comparing aboveground biomass predictions for an uneven-aged pine-dominated stand using local, regional, and national modelsAuthor(s): D.C. Bragg; K.M. McElligott
Source: Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science. 67: 34-41
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: View PDF (897.09 KB)
DescriptionSequestration by Arkansas forests removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, storing this carbon in biomass that fills a number of critical ecological and socioeconomic functions. We need a better understanding of the contribution of forests to the carbon cycle, including the accurate quantification of tree biomass. Models have long been developed to predict aboveground live tree biomass, but few of these have been derived from Arkansas forests. Since there is geographic variability in the growth and yield of pine as a function of genetics, site conditions, growth rate, stand stocking, and other factors, we decided to compare aboveground tree biomass estimates for a naturally regenerated, uneven-aged loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)-dominated stand on the Crossett Experimental Forest (CEF) in southeastern Arkansas. These predictions were made using a new locally derived biomass equation, five regional biomass equations, and the pine model from the National Biomass Estimators. With the local model as the baseline, considerable biomass variation appeared across a range of diameters—at the greatest diameter considered, the minimum value was only 69% of the maximum. Using a recent inventory from the CEF’s Good Farm Forty to compare each model, stand-level biomass estimates ranged from a low of 76.9 Mg/ha (a different Arkansas model) to as much as 96.1 Mg/ha (an Alabama model); the local CEF equation predicted 82.5 Mg/ha. A number of different factors contributed to this variability, including differences in model form and derivation procedures, geographic origins, and utilization standards. Regardless of the source of the departures, their magnitude suggests that care be used when making large-scale biomass estimates.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBragg, D.C.; McElligott, K.M. 2013. Comparing aboveground biomass predictions for an uneven-aged pine-dominated stand using local, regional, and national models. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science. 67: 34-41.
KeywordsArkansas, carbon dioxide, carbon sequestration, biomass, loblolly pine, Pinus taeda, Crossett Experimental Forest, biomass estimator
- Predicting small-diameter loblolly pine aboveground biomass in naturally regenerated stands
- Modeling loblolly pine aboveground live biomass in a mature pine-hardwood stand: a cautionary tale
- Biomass estimates of small diameter planted and natural-origin loblolly pines show major departures from the National Biomass Estimator equations
XML: View XML