Skip to Main Content
Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United StatesAuthor(s): Christopher A. Armatas; Tyron J. Venn; Alan E. Watson
Source: Ecological Economics. 107: 447-456.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
View PDF (579.9 KB)
DescriptionThe underlying validity of stated preference non-market valuation methods relies on the analyst's ability to identify, select, define, and articulate the goods being valued in a way that is relevant and understandable to the respondent, which requires detailed understanding of the respondents' experiences and points of view. Poor articulation of the good being valued will result in biased to useless information for decision-makers. It should therefore be of concern to economists and policymakers that the question of how best to perform pre-design qualitative work with local stakeholders is a neglected area of inquiry. This paper assesses Q-methodology as an objective, transparent, easily replicable, and statistically-rigorous approach to qualitative research to support the selection and definition of attributes for non-market valuation.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
CitationArmatas, Christopher A.; Venn, Tyron J.; Watson, Alan E. 2014. Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States. Ecological Economics. 107: 447-456.
Keywordsstated preference methods, ecosystem services, environmental goods, environmental valuation, factor analysis, survey methods, qualitative methods
- Wildfire and the economic value of wilderness recreation
- Non-Market Valuation
- Social construction of arctic wilderness: place meanings, value pluralism, and globalization
XML: View XML