Skip to Main Content
Plant hybridization: the role of human disturbance and biological invasionAuthor(s): Qinfeng Guo
Source: Diversity and Distributions
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Southern Research Station
View PDF (798.87 KB)
DescriptionAim Anderson & Stebbins (1954, Evolution, 8, 378–388) posited that human activities promote species hybridizations by creating opportunities for hybridization and new habitats for hybrids to persist through disturbances (i.e. the ‘disturbance hypothesis’). While the first part of this hypothesis appears to be well supported, the second part has not been corroborated with empirical evidence, probably because of the lack of appropriate data. In this study, I (1) document the richness and distribution of hybrid plants in the United States; (2) examine the relationships between hybrids of different origins and between hybrid plants and native or exotic plants; and (3) examine possible mechanisms for these relationships and test the disturbance hypothesis.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGuo, Qinfeng. 2014. Plant hybridization: the role of human disturbance and biological invasion. Diversity and Distributions 2014 20, 9 p.
KeywordsBiological invasions, conservation, distribution, exotics, genetic novelty, richness
- Relative effects of human and feral hog disturbance on a wet forest in Hawaii
- Human perspectives in horticulture
- Tracing the role of human civilization in the globalization of plant pathogens
XML: View XML