Skip to Main Content
Developing and evaluating rapid field methods to estimate peat carbonAuthor(s): Rodney A. Chimner; Cassandra A. Ott; Charles H. Perry; Randall K. Kolka
Source: Wetlands. 34(6): 1241-1246.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
View PDF (261.03 KB)
DescriptionMany international protocols (e.g., REDD+) are developing inventories of ecosystem carbon stocks and fluxes at country and regional scales, which can include peatlands. As the only nationally implemented field inventory and remeasurement of forest soils in the US, the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Program (FIA) samples the top 20 cm of organic soils, but there is a large unsampled fraction of soil carbon stored in America’s peatland forests. Improved methods could allow the FIA program to more comprehensively estimate soil carbon stocks and stock change in forested peatlands. We evaluated six rapid peat sampling methods in northern peatlands: 1) general probing of peat thickness, 2) general probing of peat thickness by general vegetation type, 3) partial profile coring #1, 0-20 cm, 4) partial profile coring #2, 25-75 cm, 5) partial profile coring #3, 50-100 cm, 6) intermittent profile coring and compared them to 7) measurements derived from whole profile sampling. We also tested our methods against an independent database of 85 peat cores collected from Manitoba, Canada. Overall, we found that the 0-20 cm partial profile core method was the least accurate method and should not be used (64-67 % accurate). The remaining rapid peat sampling methods all provided accuracies >85 % compared to whole profile sampling. In conclusion, we found that there are several good options for rapidly sampling peat C stocks that if incorporated, could greatly increase our estimates of carbon stored in peat.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
CitationChimner, Rodney A.; Ott, Cassandra A.; Perry, Charles H.; Kolka, Randall K. 2014. Developing and evaluating rapid field methods to estimate peat carbon. Wetlands. 34(6): 1241-1246.
KeywordsPeat, Coring, Carbon, Sampling, Soil
- Imaging tropical peatlands in Indonesia using ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity imaging (ERI): implications for carbon stock estimates and peat soil characterization
- Method comparison for forest soil carbon and nitrogen estimates in the Delaware River basin
- An appraisal of Indonesia's immense peat carbon stock using national peatland maps: uncertainties and potential losses from conversion
XML: View XML